Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 45 — Post-mortem report — Relevance of
August 24th, 2013
Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 45 — Post-mortem report — Relevance of — Held, post-mortem report is not a substantive piece of evidence — But the evidence of such doctor cannot be insignificant.
State of Haryana v. Ram Singh, (2002)2 SCC 426, Referred.
(Para 19)
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Chand[Bench Strength 2], Criminal Appeal No. 269/2007(03/07/2013), 2013(8) SCALE 591: 2013(9) JT 409 [A.K. Patnaik, J.: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J.]
Entry Filed under: Legal Updates
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed